[HOT] OSM Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority

Mike Thompson miketho16 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 20 14:24:51 UTC 2016


John,

I agree the most recent imagery should be used, but how do we know the
collection date for the Bing imagery?

Mike

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I imagine the most recent imagery should be used.  Some imagery is quite
> old so more buildings may have been built.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 20 February 2016 at 09:00, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net> wrote:
>
>> OSM Tasking manaager #1129  imagery priority
>>
>> When there is a difference between detailed Bing imagery and the
>> WorldView-2, 07 Nov 2014; DigitalGlobe, NextView imagery which should take
>> precedence?
>>
>> An example can be seen to the south west of the sports pitch here
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114
>>
>> There are two small buildings north of the DepEd building on Bing, not
>> seen on Worldview
>>
>> There is a small group of trees to the immediate west of The DedEd
>> building on Bing, but buildings can be seen here in Worldview
>>
>> This is a minor, but easy to appreciate example.  I have also come across
>> quite a few buildings traced from Bing (and still visible on the Bing
>> imagery), but there is no evidence of these on Wordview imagery
>>
>> David
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160220/e5d29ac2/attachment.html>


More information about the HOT mailing list