[HOT] OSM Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority
David Groom
reviews at pacific-rim.net
Sat Feb 20 15:01:56 UTC 2016
Yes, that was really my point. perhaps I should have been more explicit.
So my question is really which is the later imagery? Bing or Worldview
David
On 20/02/2016 14:24, Mike Thompson wrote:
> John,
>
> I agree the most recent imagery should be used, but how do we know the
> collection date for the Bing imagery?
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
> <mailto:jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I imagine the most recent imagery should be used. Some imagery is
> quite old so more buildings may have been built.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 20 February 2016 at 09:00, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net
> <mailto:reviews at pacific-rim.net>> wrote:
>
> OSM Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority
>
> When there is a difference between detailed Bing imagery and
> the WorldView-2, 07 Nov 2014; DigitalGlobe, NextView imagery
> which should take precedence?
>
> An example can be seen to the south west of the sports pitch
> here http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114
>
> There are two small buildings north of the DepEd building on
> Bing, not seen on Worldview
>
> There is a small group of trees to the immediate west of The
> DedEd building on Bing, but buildings can be seen here in
> Worldview
>
> This is a minor, but easy to appreciate example. I have also
> come across quite a few buildings traced from Bing (and still
> visible on the Bing imagery), but there is no evidence of
> these on Wordview imagery
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
More information about the HOT
mailing list