[HOT] OSM Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority

[Mike Thompson]

Michael,

That is fantastic!  Thanks for pointing that out.

Mike

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Michael Heißmeier <
michael63 at digital-filestore.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> in JOSM:
>
> right-click on the background imagery and select "show tile info" from the
> context menu. The lowest line contains the capture date of the current tile.
>
>
> David Groom, 2016-02-20 16:01:
>
> Yes, that was really my point.  perhaps I should have been more explicit.
>
> So my question is really which is the later imagery?  Bing or Worldview
>
> David
>
> On 20/02/2016 14:24, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
> John,
>
> I agree the most recent imagery should be used, but how do we know the
> collection date for the Bing imagery?
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com <mailto:jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I imagine the most recent imagery should be used.  Some imagery is
>     quite old so more buildings may have been built.
>
>     Cheerio John
>
>     On 20 February 2016 at 09:00, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net
>     <mailto:reviews at pacific-rim.net> <reviews at pacific-rim.net>> wrote:
>
>         OSM Tasking manaager #1129  imagery priority
>
>         When there is a difference between detailed Bing imagery and
>         the WorldView-2, 07 Nov 2014; DigitalGlobe, NextView imagery
>         which should take precedence?
>
>         An example can be seen to the south west of the sports pitch
>         here http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114
>
>         There are two small buildings north of the DepEd building on
>         Bing, not seen on Worldview
>
>         There is a small group of trees to the immediate west of The
>         DedEd building on Bing, but buildings can be seen here in
>         Worldview
>
>         This is a minor, but easy to appreciate example. I have also
>         come across quite a few buildings traced from Bing (and still
>         visible on the Bing imagery), but there is no evidence of
>         these on Wordview imagery
>
>         David
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         HOT mailing list
>         HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org> <HOT at openstreetmap.org>
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     HOT mailing list
>     HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org> <HOT at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing listHOT at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Michael (osm:michael63) *
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160220/caf5b057/attachment.html>