[HOT] OSM Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority

Michael HeiƟmeier michael63 at digital-filestore.de
Sat Feb 20 15:17:09 UTC 2016


Hi,

in JOSM:

right-click on the background imagery and select "show tile info" from the 
context menu. The lowest line contains the capture date of the current tile.


David Groom, 2016-02-20 16:01:
> Yes, that was really my point.  perhaps I should have been more explicit.
>
> So my question is really which is the later imagery?  Bing or Worldview
>
> David
>
> On 20/02/2016 14:24, Mike Thompson wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> I agree the most recent imagery should be used, but how do we know the
>> collection date for the Bing imagery?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      I imagine the most recent imagery should be used.  Some imagery is
>>      quite old so more buildings may have been built.
>>
>>      Cheerio John
>>
>>      On 20 February 2016 at 09:00, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net
>>      <mailto:reviews at pacific-rim.net>> wrote:
>>
>>          OSM Tasking manaager #1129  imagery priority
>>
>>          When there is a difference between detailed Bing imagery and
>>          the WorldView-2, 07 Nov 2014; DigitalGlobe, NextView imagery
>>          which should take precedence?
>>
>>          An example can be seen to the south west of the sports pitch
>>          here http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114
>>
>>          There are two small buildings north of the DepEd building on
>>          Bing, not seen on Worldview
>>
>>          There is a small group of trees to the immediate west of The
>>          DedEd building on Bing, but buildings can be seen here in
>>          Worldview
>>
>>          This is a minor, but easy to appreciate example. I have also
>>          come across quite a few buildings traced from Bing (and still
>>          visible on the Bing imagery), but there is no evidence of
>>          these on Wordview imagery
>>
>>          David
>>
>>          _______________________________________________
>>          HOT mailing list
>>          HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org>
>>          https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>>
>>      _______________________________________________
>>      HOT mailing list
>>      HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org>
>>      https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


-- 
/Michael
(osm:michael63) /
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160220/b567051d/attachment.html>


More information about the HOT mailing list