[HOT] OSM Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority
Michael Heißmeier
michael63 at digital-filestore.de
Sat Feb 20 15:17:09 UTC 2016
Hi,
in JOSM:
right-click on the background imagery and select "show tile info" from the
context menu. The lowest line contains the capture date of the current tile.
David Groom, 2016-02-20 16:01:
> Yes, that was really my point. perhaps I should have been more explicit.
>
> So my question is really which is the later imagery? Bing or Worldview
>
> David
>
> On 20/02/2016 14:24, Mike Thompson wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> I agree the most recent imagery should be used, but how do we know the
>> collection date for the Bing imagery?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I imagine the most recent imagery should be used. Some imagery is
>> quite old so more buildings may have been built.
>>
>> Cheerio John
>>
>> On 20 February 2016 at 09:00, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net
>> <mailto:reviews at pacific-rim.net>> wrote:
>>
>> OSM Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority
>>
>> When there is a difference between detailed Bing imagery and
>> the WorldView-2, 07 Nov 2014; DigitalGlobe, NextView imagery
>> which should take precedence?
>>
>> An example can be seen to the south west of the sports pitch
>> here http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114
>>
>> There are two small buildings north of the DepEd building on
>> Bing, not seen on Worldview
>>
>> There is a small group of trees to the immediate west of The
>> DedEd building on Bing, but buildings can be seen here in
>> Worldview
>>
>> This is a minor, but easy to appreciate example. I have also
>> come across quite a few buildings traced from Bing (and still
>> visible on the Bing imagery), but there is no evidence of
>> these on Wordview imagery
>>
>> David
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
--
/Michael
(osm:michael63) /
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160220/b567051d/attachment.html>
More information about the HOT
mailing list