[HOT] Fwd: Accuracy ( international women's day)

Chris Fleming me at chrisfleming.org
Mon Feb 29 22:33:29 UTC 2016

Blake has mostly covered it. But worth saying explicitly, if we assume that
the best you're going to get on a GPS is 5m, but your concern is that
you're mapping things that are much closer together - then the solution is
to combine the GPS and paper based approach. The important thing from a
navigation point of view is getting the relevant features correctly placed
reactive to each other.

What you will find is that the combination of airial/gps and survey data
will bring the accuracy down. But ultimately, relative postition is the key.


On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 at 17:43 Gertrude Hope <trudyhope7 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Blake,
> Thank you so much for The information.
> On Feb 29, 2016 7:31 PM, "Blake Girardot" <bgirardot at gmail.com> wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160229/952cddf6/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list