[HOT] Fwd: Accuracy ( international women's day)

Gertrude Hope trudyhope7 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 29 22:35:43 UTC 2016

Thank you Chris

On Mar 1, 2016 12:33 AM, "Chris Fleming" <me at chrisfleming.org> wrote:

> Blake has mostly covered it. But worth saying explicitly, if we assume
> that the best you're going to get on a GPS is 5m, but your concern is that
> you're mapping things that are much closer together - then the solution is
> to combine the GPS and paper based approach. The important thing from a
> navigation point of view is getting the relevant features correctly placed
> reactive to each other.
> What you will find is that the combination of airial/gps and survey data
> will bring the accuracy down. But ultimately, relative postition is the key.
> Cheers
> Chris
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 at 17:43 Gertrude Hope <trudyhope7 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Blake,
>> Thank you so much for The information.
>> On Feb 29, 2016 7:31 PM, "Blake Girardot" <bgirardot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160229/65eaf016/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list