[HOT] New mapping projects that could use some experienced mappers

Pete Masters pedrito1414 at googlemail.com
Wed Mar 16 11:56:48 UTC 2016


building=multiple certainly describes it better. Terraces, in my mind, are
generally linear in form, whereas some of these collections of buildings
extend in all sorts of directions. Advice from the tagging list would be
really useful, I think....

Thanks Joost,

Pete

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:30 AM, joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com>
wrote:

> In Belgium (and probably most other European countries), cities are a
> hodgepodge of buildings and extensions built over time. It would change the
> meaning of building=terrace to use this in cases like this. (even the
> government can't keep track of this, often buildings are simply split along
> the cadastral borders)
>
> It would remove the implied meaning of building=yes to mean just one
> building, to tag this as just one building. However, the wiki page for
> building=yes doesn't even state this is the case. So between the two
> options I would pick this one.
>
> A more thorough solution might be a tag like building=multiple (used 22
> times...) or a messy solution might be building=yes + fixme="remap
> individual buildings"
>
> If you like, I can post on the tagging list and report back here.
>
> 2016-03-16 11:45 GMT+01:00 Pete Masters <pedrito1414 at googlemail.com>:
>
>> Hi Jaako,
>>
>> It's an interesting point. Being from the uk, I associate terraces with
>> something very different from what is being mapped in Damascus.... But,
>> building=yes is misleading in this case and terrace is a much more logical
>> description.
>>
>> Be interested to hear what others think....
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Jaakko Helleranta <jaakko at helleranta.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pete & all,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Pete Masters <
>>> pedrito1414 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> some of the buildings are too difficult distinguish individually.
>>>> However, I can see that there is a whole block of buildins. Is it ok to
>>>> trace and tag the whole block as building=yes?
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a recurring issue/challenge in many densely built areas. I've
>>> come to think that in many cases they are often essentially local
>>> "row-houses" as I've gotten to know them in Finland or townhouses as
>>> Americans would call individual buildings that are attached to each other
>>> by their side walls but have their own entrances -- and can even be totally
>>> independently built over time, even decades. And for row-houses/townhouses
>>> there is an existing tag: building=terrace , see
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace .
>>>
>>> I don't remember that it would have been discussed in the context of
>>> HOT's mapping projects if this would be a suitable tag. But I think that
>>> especially when the buildings in question are attached by their side walls
>>> it's really quite clear that they are, indeed, "terrace" houses. Of course
>>> it's not often possible to be sure from imagery if the buildings are
>>> actually attached by their side walls or if they e.g. have (narrow)
>>> passages/paths between them, possibly under roofs. But at least
>>> building=terrace implies that it's (likely) not a single large building.
>>> As it can be seen from Taginfo the tag is also used already globally
>>> covering not only Europe and North America / other more developed areas but
>>> also other parts of the world too.
>>>
>>> This said, perhaps the "terrace" house tag should be included as a
>>> common building tag in applicable HOT mapping projects?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Jaakko
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nicaragua main mobile/WhatsApp/Telegram: +505-8131-0729, Alt. mobile
>>> 8845-3391
>>> Global (Google) Voice / SMS: +1-202-730-9778 * Skype: jhelleranta
>>> Twitter/Telegram/IRC/Mumble: @jaakkoh * My profile:
>>> http://jaakko.helleranta.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Pete Masters*
>> Missing Maps Project Coordinator
>> +44 7921 781 518
>>
>> missingmaps.org <http://www.missingmaps.org/>
>>
>> *@pedrito1414* <https://twitter.com/TheMissingMaps>
>> *@theMissingMaps* <https://twitter.com/TheMissingMaps>
>> *facebook.com/MissingMapsProject*
>> <https://www.facebook.com/MissingMapsProject>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Joost @
> Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
> <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/> | Reddit
> <https://www.reddit.com/u/joostjakob> | Wordpress
> <https://joostschouppe.wordpress.com/>
>



-- 
*Pete Masters*
Missing Maps Project Coordinator
+44 7921 781 518

missingmaps.org <http://www.missingmaps.org/>

*@pedrito1414* <https://twitter.com/TheMissingMaps>
*@theMissingMaps* <https://twitter.com/TheMissingMaps>
*facebook.com/MissingMapsProject*
<https://www.facebook.com/MissingMapsProject>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160316/5460b9f8/attachment.html>


More information about the HOT mailing list