[HOT] [Osmf-talk] [hotosm-membership] Re: Code of Conduct Reminder

Milo van der Linden milo at dogodigi.net
Fri Dec 15 19:13:00 UTC 2017

I feel almost all friction on this list, right now and in the past, has
been between "those that want to organize" and those that do not want to be

The hot mailinglist is the only one in the openstreetmap lists I see this

Maybe somebody with a background in social behaviour could explain this
phenomenon, why it occurs and how it can be resolved?

On Dec 15, 2017 7:44 PM, "Dale Kunce" <dale.kunce at gmail.com> wrote:

Just to clear the air. I misspoke in my initial post when I said the HOT
CoC would be enforced on this list. I've since learned that the HOT list is
not administered by HOT and thus our community crafted CoC does not apply
here. Note: it does apply to all other HOT communication channels,
including Tasking Manager, GitHub, slack, etc.

As Mikel said the existing OSM Etiquette rules, however, do apply in this

My earlier statement of asking all community members of this list to think
twice about what you say on this list. This is not an effort to curb free
speech but instead to build a positive collaborative space to discuss.

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Russell Deffner <
russell.deffner at hotosm.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I would prefer to participate in mailing lists that are governed by CoC
> and enforced by an organized group rather than individuals.
> =Russ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan S [mailto:danstowell+osm at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 11:11 AM
> To: Rafael Avila Coya
> Cc: osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org; Mapa Nauta; hot at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [HOT] [Osmf-talk] [hotosm-membership] Re: Code of Conduct
> Reminder
> Hi
> It does seem to me that more clarity would be good here, i.e. slightly
> disentangling the lines of accountability regarding the hot@ mailing
> list.
> Mikel's response has logical sense, but it's probably not clear to the
> average participant in the hot@ mailing list whether they are
> automatically made a part of the HOT community. Whether the best
> clarification is to have two mailing lists, or for the info page
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot> to make clear whether
> it is in general governed by HOT's rules, I don't know.
> Best
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

sent from my mobile device

Dale Kunce

HOT mailing list
HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20171215/ce5bcdc2/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list