[HOT] Could we get more out of our mappers by asking for less?
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 26 13:15:39 UTC 2017
>The one caution I would suggest is that "If something is worth mapping it
is worth mapping correctly". Here in Ethiopia I have spent a lot of time
adding nodes to roads that were digitized at a coarse scale. Mapping
quickly doesn't have to be done crudely.
There is no troupe of magic mapping elves that clean up the rough mapping.
I think this is a different conversation, I would prefer mappers take a
little more time and care, some buildings I've seen mapped have little
relationship to the size or shape of the building.
On 25 February 2017 at 21:36, Vao Matua <vaomatua at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think there is merit to what you are saying.
> The one caution I would suggest is that "If something is worth mapping it
> is worth mapping correctly". Here in Ethiopia I have spent a lot of time
> adding nodes to roads that were digitized at a coarse scale. Mapping
> quickly doesn't have to be done crudely.
> There is no troupe of magic mapping elves that clean up the rough mapping.
> The next set of HOT projects I will set up will be roads/highways only and
> then buildings only.
> Keep mapping,
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:16 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
>> Just an ideal thought. It came about as I'm loading in bits of Nigeria
>> by the enamel bucket at the moment then looking for untagged ways and
>> crossing highways.
>> What stands out are blocks where every track and settlement is mapped and
>> blank bits of the map. I've been attempting to join bits of highway
>> together to reduce the islands.
>> Projects that ask for buildings are different but for projects where we
>> are looking to map settlements and connecting highways if we omitted the
>> paths and tracks leading to fields and rivers and mapped say two or three
>> highways max to a cluster of three huts we might be able to get rid of some
>> of the large gaps in the map and unless someone can think of a reason why
>> tracks and paths leading to fields are essential I think many NGOs could
>> manage without. In return we could make more settlements and highways
>> available in the same time frame.
>> Part of the problem is each project is looked at separately. Each
>> project manager only thinks in terms of their own project rather than in
>> terms of how much resources are available overall. I am aware that some
>> organisations feel they are independent having their own mapathons but to
>> get the quality up you need validation and if you don't believe me just
>> have a look at the map after a mapathon. Nigeria is full of settlements
>> wrongly tagged, building=residential or yes are amongst the most common
>> incorrect tagging. A number of small villages have been interconnected
>> with highway=primary etc. Crossing ways by the hundred.
>> I don't know how you would write the instructions for a such a project
>> but it might help the projects get completed more quickly. I heard an off
>> the cuff remark about a project recently, "It'll take a year at that level
>> of detail.". Off the cuff comments are more gut feel than accurate but
>> there was an element of truth in the remark and I had the feeling the data
>> was desired within a month or two. I would suggest if you want the mapping
>> done quickly reduce the scope a little.
>> Thanks John
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT