[HOT] Fwd: Re: landuse=residential within landuse=residential

Nick Allen nick.allen.54 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 28 18:58:23 UTC 2017


Missed the list with my reply.

Nick (OSM=Tallguy)
my phone is responsible for any spelling mistakes!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Nick Allen" <nick.allen.54 at gmail.com>
Date: 28 Mar 2017 19:57
Subject: Re: [HOT] landuse=residential within landuse=residential
To: "john whelan" <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>

I think it depends on the project instructions.

For instance the Aweil tasks such as http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/2525
Have a link to a very good diary entry with good screenshots indicating
largish residential boundaries.

Some of the others say something like 2 buildings.

Nick (OSM=Tallguy)
my phone is responsible for any spelling mistakes!

On 28 Mar 2017 18:48, "john whelan" <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:

I'm starting to see areas where someone has mapped a largish area
landuse=residential and other mappers have tightly mapped groups of
buildings and tagged landuse=residential within this.

I'm not sure whether to ignore them or delete one or the other?

Thoughts please.

Thanks John

HOT mailing list
HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20170328/d4ac32ac/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list