[Imports] ogr2osm: How to deal with multilinestrings?
Josh Doe
josh at joshdoe.com
Tue Mar 27 17:04:04 UTC 2012
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Guertin <andrew.guertin at uvm.edu> wrote:
> My question, then, is whether this is normal. Do other files have
> multilinestrings like this, and would benefit from changing the default
> handling--or is this file just poorly made, and should be fixed in
> file-specific translation routines? Conversely, do other files have
> multilinestrings that should be turned into relations, and would be
> harmed by changing the default handling?
The vast majority of the time, using the current tagging standards,
MultiLineStrings shouldn't be converted to relations, and we should
use Paul's approach. The only widespread exception could be
type=route, but even then I doubt this would be helpful for mapping
data that is to be imported/conflated with OSM since we still tag
member ways (and even though some data is overlapped between the
relation and the way, the concepts are different). Perhaps in the
future our tools and model will improve to support this kind of
structure, but we're not there now.
Definitely make it possible to create relations from MultiLineStrings,
but by default apply tags to member ways.
-Josh
More information about the Imports
mailing list