[Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosion sites

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

> Am 15.04.2015 um 23:13 schrieb Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:
> 
> I'm totally ok with mapping craters by the way. The fact that there is a
> crater of a certain extent is verifiable on the ground. The fact that
> the crater was caused by an explosion with so-and-so-much energy at a
> certain time through a military program called "Bombtastic" is not.


This is where we differ, I think the bomb data belongs to the crater and should be kept. Without the nuclear explosions there remains just natural=crater (that's actual tagging I have seen in Nevada).

Events like those in your example with no traces left could be deleted.

Cheers 
Martin