[Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosion sites
bryce2 at obviously.com
Fri Apr 17 19:18:05 UTC 2015
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Am 17.04.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
> > In all cases the argument that "some barely-detectable trace
> archaeological remnant remains" seems to be thin justification for a
> pre-held like of the feature.
> The only problem with this comparison is that craters with hundreds of
> meters of diameter don't typically fall into the "barely-detectable"
Nobody has, at any stage, objected to mapping craters
Craters and shorter mountains are fine: they represent visible features in
Missing atols however are arguable, as are the historic events that seem
better suited to a database of georeferenced historic events.
Creating such a database would open up tremendous opportunity to map other
events, like Woodstock (the concert), or
other famous event sites that don't have plaques or memorials.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports