[Imports] Slovenia landcover import RABA-KGZ review

[Christoph Hormann]

On Tuesday 16 June 2015, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> Was the use of "raba:id" ever approved? I can't remember, it sounds a
> bit funny.

It is not a feature id from the source data but a feature class.  IMO it 
makes sense to keep such in case of more complicated feature class to 
tag translation, for example if different feature classes receive the 
same tag and later it might make sense to change or supplement these 
tags when tagging conventions are changed - of course only if there 
were not manual edits in between.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/