[Imports] For comment: import of 532 bicycle repair station locations

Michal Palenik michal.palenik at freemap.sk
Fri Mar 20 09:11:08 UTC 2015


what about service:bicycle:diy = 'yes' ?

michal
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 06:06:13AM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> "*bicycle_tool_stand *or* bike_self_repair_tools* might have been less
> confusing." - in that case maybe name should be changed?
> This tag is still new and rarely used so it is still possible.
> 
> 2015-03-20 2:38 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
> 
> > It's now possible to evaluate these issues.
> >
> > The import has moved into the synchronization phase. A few dozen imported
> > locations have been located on the ground by mappers, and shuffled to their
> > exact position.
> >
> > The final choice on fuzzy match has been a simple 90 meter proximity
> > search.  So far all stations searched for have been found.
> >
> > The biggest problem came from out of the blue: there have been a dozen or
> > so unique mappers using the tag to mark a bicycle shop,
> > or in one case "a guy who fixes bicycles".  In retrospect the tag name *bicycle_tool_stand
> > *or* bike_self_repair_tools* might have been less confusing.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >>  On 1/22/2015 2:27 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> >>
> >>  For your comment:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Dero_Bike_Repair
> >>
> >>
> >> This is an interesting proposal
> >>
> >> *Legal*
> >> As ODbL, the data is obviously compatible and compatible with the
> >> contributor terms. It would be good to get something on the record from
> >> Dero that the license is ODbL, either an email or something public would
> >> work.
> >>
> >> *Tagging*
> >> The tagging looks okay, but it's a bit of an interesting case - bicycle
> >> repair stations are clearly of interest to mappers, but for various reasons
> >> there aren't many tagged.
> >>
> >> Dero seems to use "Dero" for their branding instead of "dero", so
> >> brand=Dero would probably be better. I would add details about the
> >> changeset tagging you're proposing on using to your proposal.
> >>
> >>
> >> *Data Quality *There are some duplicate stations in the data - downtown
> >> Vancouver has an example of two at the exact same location with different
> >> operators. Outside Seattle at Bellevue College is another example which is
> >> possibly duplicates.
> >>
> >>
> >> *Fuzzy Matching *It's hard to comment on this. What ever matching is
> >> used will undoubtedly need tweaking, both after importing reveals problems
> >> and as bike repair stations become more common, both as street furniture,
> >> in Dero's database, and in the OSM database.
> >>
> >> How will it be handled if a station is imported, then a subsequent import
> >> run finds it has been deleted?
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Imports mailing list
> >> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Imports mailing list
> > Imports at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
> >
> >

> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports


-- 
michal palenik
www.freemap.sk
www.oma.sk




More information about the Imports mailing list