[Imports] Slovenia landcover import RABA-KGZ review

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2015-11-24 16:53 GMT+01:00 Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com>:

> As an aside, it should perhaps be stressed that almost no-one (apart from
> the person who suggested it above ) uses the tag "landcover=trees". ...
>


actually someone has started adopting this scheme (I found it in areas
where I never mapped), and I'm inviting everybody to join in. There's no
good reason adding a landuse=forest to any arbitrary small group of trees,
besides it has always been done.



> I'm sure that it's fair to say that "natural=wood" is used _more_ to
> describe "here be trees" than "landcover=trees".
>


yes, no doubt. The more interesting question would be: what does this tag
imply. I am sure I would get more consistent answers from any 100 mappers I
ask about their interpretation of the tag for landcover=trees and for
natural=wood.

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20151124/bc0ca8d3/attachment.html>