[Imports] Slovenia landcover import RABA-KGZ review

[colored stone]

I can see this tag is stil in a proposal status. In a way the definition is
quite clear "any area covered with trees, regardless of it being natural or
not, in a forest or in a park/garden". This is what normal OSM mapper can
see and map.

I don't like "trees" so much - its sounds a bit strange for large forests
areas (those are forests), much better for smaller area covered by trees.
But ok.

I don't see a big advantage to use both tags - landuse=forest and
landcover=trees. Because they will be used more or less for same areas.

...

I like "landuse=highway" proposed as well.

Regards,

Martin





On 25 November 2015 at 11:25, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> 2015-11-25 0:16 GMT+01:00 colored stone <coloredstone.si at gmail.com>:
>
>> Anyway (respecting definition and practical meaning), the transformation
>> of RABA-KGZ data to OSM using landuse=forest tag should be correct.
>
>
>
> what do you think about additionally adding landcover=trees?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20151126/a66e332a/attachment.html>