[Imports] Imports Digest, Vol 109, Issue 28
Chris
teslas_moustache at riseup.net
Wed Jul 25 03:29:41 UTC 2018
Missouri's Freedom of Information Act, Missouri Code 610 (http://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=610.010&bid=30414&hl=) defines Public Record as "any record, whether written or electronically stored, retained by or of any public governmental body including any report, survey, memorandum, or other document or study prepared for the public governmental body by a consultant or other professional service paid for in whole or in part by public funds, including records created or maintained by private contractors under an agreement with a public governmental body or on behalf of a public governmental body."
The record of physical addresses is maintained by the County Assessor.
On July 24, 2018 12:00:49 PM UTC, imports-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
>Send Imports mailing list submissions to
> imports at openstreetmap.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> imports-request at openstreetmap.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> imports-owner at openstreetmap.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Imports digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: South KC address import (Pavel Machek)
> 2. Re: South KC address import (Brian May)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:51:15 +0200
>From: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>
>To: Michael Reichert <osm-ml at michreichert.de>
>Cc: imports at openstreetmap.org, teslas_moustache
> <teslas_moustache at riseup.net>
>Subject: Re: [Imports] South KC address import
>Message-ID: <20180723145115.GA26315 at amd>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hi!
>
>> > RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
>> >
>> > The City reserves the right to discontinue availability of
>content
>> > on this website at any time and for any reason. The City reserves
>the
>> > right to claim or seek to protect any patent, copyright, trademark,
>or
>> > other intellectual property rights in any of the information,
>images,
>> > software, or processes displayed or used at this website. These
>Terms of
>> > Use do not grant anyone any title or right to any patent,
>copyright,
>> > trademark or other intellectual property rights that the City may
>have
>> > in any of the information, images, software, or processes displayed
>or
>> > used at this website.
>>
>> This term is vague. That's why I think that it is incompatible. Data
>to
>> be added to OSM must not have revokeable licenses (except violation
>of
>> the license).
>
>What exactly do you find problematic?
>
>City reserves right to shut down their website... which is not a
>problem.
>
> Pavel
>
>--
>(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
>(cesky, pictures)
>http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: signature.asc
>Type: application/pgp-signature
>Size: 181 bytes
>Desc: Digital signature
>URL:
><http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20180723/8e941457/attachment-0001.sig>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:18:27 -0400
>From: Brian May <bmay at mapwise.com>
>To: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>, Michael Reichert
> <osm-ml at michreichert.de>
>Cc: imports at openstreetmap.org, teslas_moustache
> <teslas_moustache at riseup.net>
>Subject: Re: [Imports] South KC address import
>Message-ID: <8b1d5366-ab93-afc0-0629-2c07ee717173 at mapwise.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>On 7/23/2018 10:51 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>>> RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
>>>>
>>>> The City reserves the right to discontinue availability of
>content
>>>> on this website at any time and for any reason. The City reserves
>the
>>>> right to claim or seek to protect any patent, copyright, trademark,
>or
>>>> other intellectual property rights in any of the information,
>images,
>>>> software, or processes displayed or used at this website. These
>Terms of
>>>> Use do not grant anyone any title or right to any patent,
>copyright,
>>>> trademark or other intellectual property rights that the City may
>have
>>>> in any of the information, images, software, or processes displayed
>or
>>>> used at this website.
>>> This term is vague. That's why I think that it is incompatible. Data
>to
>>> be added to OSM must not have revokeable licenses (except violation
>of
>>> the license).
>> What exactly do you find problematic?
>>
>> City reserves right to shut down their website... which is not a
>> problem.
>>
>> Pavel
>
>State law defines what constitutes a public record held within a
>state/county/city agency for all government entities within a state.
>The
>laws also define methods of access and whether records can be
>copyrighted and/or restricted in any way. Look up the state law
>regarding public records and see whether or not the city has any say at
>
>all.
>
>Many times the legalese put on a state/county/city website is
>meaningless and was put there for some sort of feel-good "protection
>from misuse" or "protection of rights" that the state/county/city does
>not even have. For example, if Kansas has open records laws and all
>public records are in the public domain, you are good to go no matter
>what the city says on their website. If Kansas has public records laws
>that allow states/counties/cities to copyright public data and restrict
>
>how it is used, then you have to negotiate with the state/county/city,
>because they may say, OK well that was legal mumbo-jumbo, we are fine
>if
>you use it in the public domain. Or they can say, we the government own
>
>the people's data and the people don't have unrestricted rights to the
>data, etc, because the state laws allow them to do that.
>
>Brian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Subject: Digest Footer
>
>_______________________________________________
>Imports mailing list
>Imports at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of Imports Digest, Vol 109, Issue 28
>****************************************
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20180725/d92735cc/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Imports
mailing list