[Imports] [talk-au] Public Barbeques in the ACT

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am Do., 11. Okt. 2018 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <
matkoniecz at tutanota.com>:

> 10. Oct 2018 23:17 by joi at betra.is:
>
> I'd consider it a vandalism to remove things you do not recognize but are
> in usage unknown to you, there is no benefit to saving 30 bytes in the
> database and lose interoperability with other data sources.
>
> Main drawback is that OSM objects have tags that are undocumented, without
> clear meaning and usage unknown to others.
>
>
>

yes, these tags can prevent cautious users from editing things because they
don't know what to do with them. I also never know what to do with
ref:proprietaryid=123 when I modify something with this tag, because I do
not know to what it refers and what it describes. Is it for the building?
The business? Must I modify it, remove it or keep it? If I split a way,
should I keep it on all pieces? If I combine 2 ways, will the foreign ref
still apply to the combined object? Maybe I shouldn't split or combine the
objects because of the foreign key?

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20181011/595f9906/attachment.html>