[Imports] Should this 4-year-old import be deleted? (Ulster County, NY)
james2432 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 23 21:46:27 UTC 2019
Looks like a pixelated mess...if it wasnt so bad, I'd say keep it, but
makes the map look cheap when it doesnt reflect reality
On Wed., Jan. 23, 2019, 4:26 p.m. Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org wrote:
> I stumbled across this old import:
> (There's a few more with source=Ulster County GIS.)
> It contains a ton of so-called building footprints, but in reality these
> are all squares, independent of the actual building footprint. Also it
> covers only approximately half of existing buildings, and has many
> buildings where there's nothing visible on aerial imagery at all.
> To me this looks like a really low-quality data set that should be
> removed, at least where objects haven't been touched by mappers since. I
> did not see one single house in this import that actually matched the
> situation visible on aerial imagery.
> Even if you're a fan of building imports, you would likely agree that
> having this data in place will massively complicate any later conflation
> of a better data set.
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports