[Imports] `lgbtq=primary` ? | Re: Import of information and care points in Catalunya, Spain

[Rory McCann]

On 07.03.19 21:32, Lanxana . wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'd like to get feedback on my plan for import the information and care 
> points for women and LGTBI collectives in Catalunya, Spain. This 
> importation will be an act to celebrate 8M 2019 and the second aniverary 
> of GeoChicas.
> The import had been discussed on talk-es list and you can see the import 
> plan here:
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_information_and_care_points_for_women_and_LGTBI_collectives_in_Catalunya
> 
> If there are no objections, the import would start from March 15.
> 
> Thanks

For the "LGBTI Comprehensive Services Services Network of Catalonia" 
venues you are suggesting `social_facility:for=LGBTI` tag. Can I suggest 
you add a `lgbtq=primary` tag to the object too? 
`community_centre:for=lgbtq` has 32 occurances. Would 
`social_facility:for=lgbtq` be more in keeping?

(I knew when I suggested `lgbtq` tag that it might miss some groups :( )

You should add an `import=yes`, as well as the appropriate `source` to 
the changeset tags too.

Can you provide some numbers on how many venues there are? You say some 
You don't list any import accounts, it looks like it's going to be done 
by people who just turn up on the day? Is that not a bit risky to have 
inexperienced mappers doing an import? Do all these users know about 
"separate import account"?

You say "some venues share a location", any idea how many? Shouldn't you 
merge the source data appropriately?

Have you done any conflation yourself to see how many times there 
already is existing data?

Rory