[Imports] Fwd: `lgbtq=primary` ? | Re: Import of information and care points in Catalunya, Spain

Lanxana . lanxanae at gmail.com
Sun Mar 10 20:18:36 UTC 2019


Thanks Rory for your observations,

about the LGTBI centers, I was evaluating to use community_center, but as
their function is to inform and to advise, I decided that social_facility
was more adjusted to their use. I think it's good idea to make the change
to 'social_facility:for=lgbtq', even if some groups are left out. When I
consulted in TagInfo I forgot to do the search with the english acronym.
I'll add the 'lgtbq=primary' to the dataset, and 'import=yes' and the
source tags to the changesets tags.

About the datasets, once debugged, these are their numbers:
Dataset 1: 11 centers, managed by the municipality of Barcelona
Dataset 2: 134 centers, of which there are 5 on the map. Some centers are
in the dataset 1, in these cases the labels are supplementary and we
combine in a single node. There are some cases when there are two centers
on the same locality and building, but there are managed by different
administrations. Since they are technically different, the two nodes will
be manitained.
Dataset 3: 62 centers, some share location and building with the previous
ones, but they are different organisms and different nodes.
Dataset 4: 1033 centers, some located in public buildings, which would
share location with the previous ones, just as there may be more than one
association in the same building. Being distinct elements, all nodes are
maintained.

About the import, I know that we may to use dedicated usernames. For the
import, there will be experienced and new users, for which a step-by-step
guide is being prepared. If their have any doubt, they will be asket to
skip the point and write it down so that a experimented used can inspect it.

Thanks!

El sáb., 9 mar. 2019 a las 19:38, Rory McCann (<rory at technomancy.org>)
escribió:

> On 07.03.19 21:32, Lanxana . wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to get feedback on my plan for import the information and care
> > points for women and LGTBI collectives in Catalunya, Spain. This
> > importation will be an act to celebrate 8M 2019 and the second aniverary
> > of GeoChicas.
> > The import had been discussed on talk-es list and you can see the import
> > plan here:
> >
> >
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_information_and_care_points_for_women_and_LGTBI_collectives_in_Catalunya
> >
> > If there are no objections, the import would start from March 15.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> For the "LGBTI Comprehensive Services Services Network of Catalonia"
> venues you are suggesting `social_facility:for=LGBTI` tag. Can I suggest
> you add a `lgbtq=primary` tag to the object too?
> `community_centre:for=lgbtq` has 32 occurances. Would
> `social_facility:for=lgbtq` be more in keeping?
>
> (I knew when I suggested `lgbtq` tag that it might miss some groups :( )
>
> You should add an `import=yes`, as well as the appropriate `source` to
> the changeset tags too.
>
> Can you provide some numbers on how many venues there are? You say some
> You don't list any import accounts, it looks like it's going to be done
> by people who just turn up on the day? Is that not a bit risky to have
> inexperienced mappers doing an import? Do all these users know about
> "separate import account"?
>
> You say "some venues share a location", any idea how many? Shouldn't you
> merge the source data appropriately?
>
> Have you done any conflation yourself to see how many times there
> already is existing data?
>
> Rory
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20190310/1943c9a7/attachment.html>


More information about the Imports mailing list