[Imports] Hydrographic data import from LINZ

[Mike]

Seems to me the seamark items would be welcome - much of this you can't get
unless you are out at sea and actively looking at the object (buoy, beacon,
fogsig, lights, etc).

Where is the download to the s57 format data? Or do you mean it's in the
s57 schema but stored as shapefile/gpkg?

Also, there may be duplication of data if different usage band cells
overlap.

On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 7:49 PM Kyle Hensel <K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz> wrote:

> > How crevasses can be in rock outside glacier?
>
>
>
> I think the extent of the glaciers from the ADD import don’t quite match
> the glaciers that LINZ has surveyed.
>
> There seem to be only a few cases like this, right at the edge of the
> glacier, we can delete these if you like.
>
>
>
>
>
> > How you plan to update this data?
>
>
>
> Using the same system as the ongoing address update, you can try it
> yourself from https://osm-nz.github.io/RapiD
>
> It can handle the complex aspects like moving, editing, and deleting data.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Primary effect is to make this area uneditable.
>
>
>
> Not sure what you mean by this. This area is just as editable as any other
> part of the world, bearing in mind the lack of good quality aerial imagery.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Also, I want to repeat request for linking specific posting on mailing
> list that announced plan to import this features.
>
> > Changesets that mass added this features miss links to relevant import
> documentation.
>
>
>
> I think I answered all this in our other conversation, in addition, here
> is the link to talk-nz which I didn’t include
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-nz/2021/thread.html
>
> All changesets made after 6/10/21 have source=https://wiki.osm.org/LINZ,
> in addition to attribution=
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#LINZ which they always
> had. I hope this addresses that problem.
>
>
>
>
>
> > From what I know exact locations of crevasses in glacier are quite
> dynamic.
>
>
>
> Indeed, this was discussed during the approval process for
> natural=crevasse, and is summarised well here:
> https://wiki.osm.org/Talk:Tag:natural=crevasse
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Mateusz Konieczny via Imports <imports at openstreetmap.org>
> *Sent: *Sunday, 24 October 2021 14:20
> *Cc: *imports at openstreetmap.org
> *Subject: *Re: [Imports] Hydrographic data import from LINZ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Oct 24, 2021, 02:48 by K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz:
>
> Hi, I’m not sure what you mean by ‘geometrically incompatible features’
>
> I am pretty sure that it is about things like
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984539279
>
>
>
> How crevasses can be in rock outside glacier?
>
> As we discussed in that changeset, I can’t see this ‘damage to the
> database’ that you’re talking about.
>
> How you plan to update this data? Primary effect is to make this area
> uneditable.
>
>
>
> From what I know exact locations of crevasses in glacier are quite dynamic.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Also, I want to repeat request for linking specific posting on mailing
> list that
>
> announced plan to import this features.
>
>
>
> Changesets that mass added this features miss links to relevant import
>
> documentation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20211024/159e58d6/attachment.htm>