[Imports] Florida Landuse Import

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Mar 8, 2022, 10:00 by frederik at remote.org:

> Hi,
>
> On 3/8/22 01:39, Matheus Gomes wrote:
>
>> Regarding the fdep:landuse_code, I have the opinion that this is a valid and important information to be retained on OSM.
>>
>
> I disagree with that. It increases the data volume greatly and leads to "WTF" moments for future mappers when you have two adjacent polygons sharing a boundary and both are (e.g.) "landuse=forest" in OSM - just because they used to have different fdep:landuse_codes originally.
>
+1

- fdep:landuse_code cannot be really trusted anyway, as people can modify geometries
(iD mappers will not even see it)
- it discourages mappers from editing landuse
- based on my personal experience, such tags are thoroughly useless

Also, if checking fdep:landuse_code is necessary to understand what is going on
then it means that data was imported badly.

(nevertheless I am on opposite side of the globe - but based on my experience
I really dislike such tags and consider them as harmful)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20220309/9ca70729/attachment.htm>