[Imports] UPLOADING U-WIMP project data to osm

[Stellamaris Nakacwa]

Sure! I will be attaching them as they come in per dates. However, you can
use the sample to tease out all thoughts.

Thank you!

Stellamaris

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 11:15 AM Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Stellamaris,
>
> The community needs to have access to all of the data in the format that
> you intend to import so that we can review it, especially given the issues
> so far with this dataset.
>
> BTW, there is no GeoJSON file in the repository[0] that I am seeing, only
> the .csv and the .osm file.
>
> Mike
>
> [0] https://github.com/StellaWava/U-WIMP-OSM-DATA
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:53 AM Stellamaris Nakacwa <sn00013 at mix.wvu.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Oh! Sorry Mike,
>>
>> The csv is the initial dataset. The .geojson is the well validated
>> dataset sample.
>>
>> Stellamaris
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 10:45 AM Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Stellamaris,
>>>
>>> Thanks, I downloaded the current data.
>>>
>>> Some initial thoughts:
>>> * The CSV file has 570 points but the OSM file only has 93, why?
>>> * The OSM file contains a county=* tag.  As OSM is a spatial database,
>>> it is not necessary to indicate the county in which a feature is within.
>>> * Nevertheless, if for some reason you need to include the county in the
>>> data (you will need a strong case for doing this), you should probably put
>>> the value in title case. Currently all points are tagged as county=aswa
>>> * The OSM file contains tags for latitude and longitude, as a spatial
>>> database, this is not necessary and is redundant.  These should be removed.
>>>
>>> In general, while there have been some good changes to the data, there
>>> have also been some changes that have made the data worse (I don't recall
>>> latitude and longitude being in the previous data).
>>>
>>> I will try to get some more time to review later, I have noticed some
>>> other strange things about this data, but need to research further.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:21 AM Stellamaris Nakacwa <sn00013 at mix.wvu.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Mike,
>>>> The link to the data is within the document... Under current status.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Stellamaris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 10:08 AM Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Sellamaris,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for providing us with the link to the documentation.  Have you
>>>>> made the corrections to the data that were previously suggested?  Can we
>>>>> have access to the corrected data?
>>>>>
>>>>> First thought on the documentation is that you need to be more
>>>>> specific.  For example, while doing the import, are you going to be
>>>>> reviewing it against existing OSM data? If the point being imported is on
>>>>> top of a building in the data, but the associated photo indicates that it
>>>>> is not in fact on top of a building are you going to adjust the location of
>>>>> the building, the point, or are you not going to make an adjustment?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:02 PM Stellamaris Nakacwa <
>>>>> sn00013 at mix.wvu.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Safe Greetings All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the documentation
>>>>>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imports_Uganda_Water_Infrastructure_Mapping_Project#Current_Status>
>>>>>> for the U-WIMP import.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Stellamaris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:19 PM Stellamaris Nakacwa <
>>>>>> sn00013 at mix.wvu.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you!  I will refer the latter to the first thread of this
>>>>>>> conversation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stellamaris
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 6:59 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <
>>>>>>> dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sent from a phone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > On 10 Nov 2022, at 00:36, Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > If they are truly on top of the building in reality, then they
>>>>>>>> should be on top of the buildings on the map, however, the ones I saw were
>>>>>>>> not on top of the buildings in reality (based upon the photos that the data
>>>>>>>> linked to)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for features on buildings it is helpful to add location=rooftop as
>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Imports mailing list
>>>>>> Imports at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20221122/7c7bceca/attachment-0001.htm>