[josm-dev] Introduce versioning scheme

[Timo Juhani Lindfors]

Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> writes:
> Imi had started JOSM "versions" but they quickly became a farce; 
> everybody working with a "numbered version" (aka stable) was always told 
> to throw it away and use the latest nightly build at the first sign of 
> trouble, and every now and then he would increse the "version number" 
> and make a blog posting about all the "new" features since the last 
> version - features that everyone had, by that time, been using for months.

How about at least making "josm-tested.jar" include the SVN revision
number in its name? This would help a lot in bug reporting.