[josm-dev] Next release end of February: status update

[colliar]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

André Riedel schrieb:
> 2010/2/16 Matthias Julius <lists at julius-net.net>:
>> Karl Guggisberg <karl.guggisberg at guggis.ch> writes:
>>
>>> Based on a thread on this list I've written down a proposal for a future
>>> Build and Release Number scheme, see
>>> http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/DevelopersGuide/ReleaseNumbers. I've
>>> tried to summarize the discussion in the thread but the final proposal
>>> is obviously biased toward what I like most. Please post to this list if
>>> you have any objections or leave a note on the wiki. If this proposal
>>> was to be followed the next release would be named *JOSM 10.1*.
>> As I wrote in the other thread I am not in favor of year based version
>> numbers except for software that follows a strict yearly release
>> schedule or where the year is somehow relevant (like tax software).
>>
>> For all others I prefer feature based version numbers where a change
>> in the major part indicates substantial and potentially disruptive
>> changes like a new API version or a completely new UI or so.  Or,
>> maybe a switch from Java to Perl. ;-)
> +1
+1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREIAAYFAkt8DH4ACgkQalWTFLzqsCvE+ACfRJucRTabW3s75BxLs122WhkA
k84AnixxGIeTEixraqI627XjNcYbm4+U
=HYnw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----