[josm-dev] Similarly named ways

[Bryce Nesbitt]

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Paul Hartmann <phaaurlt at gmail.com> wrote:

> Improvement of the validator code is welcome, but I think we should just
> ignore the remaining false positives and don't add any validator-related
> tags to the OSM data.
> Paul


It would take only one tag.
Right now the validator will nag everyone editing in a particular area in
perpetuity.

How about:

*josm:validator:override=3*

Where the "3" represents the version of the given node/way/relation that
should not
trigger a validator message.  The warning could reappear later if the given
node/way
is actually edited.