[OSM-legal-talk] Is this license acceptable for a source?
fbriere at fbriere.net
Thu Apr 3 03:02:06 BST 2008
Iván Sánchez Ortega <ivansanchez at escomposlinux.org> wrote:
> The "All rights reserved" may be misleading. They'll be basically weaving all
> The only peculiar thing is that, when you have to attribute the City, you
> can't say "This data comes from the Ville de Sherbrooke government"
> or "Courtesy Ville de Sherbrooke". You *have* to say "© Ville blah blah blah,
> all rights reserved".
I knew these two points sounded familiar:
(No coincidence: I was told they based their license on GeoGratis'.
They merely added more legalese.)
Unfortunately, given the cold reception given to GeoGratis last time, I
can't say this fills me with great confidence. :(
> Moreover, depending on the canadian law, there is an easy workaround for this
> license: you're explicitly granted all rights over any modifications of the
> data. In certain jurisdictions, just converting the data to another format is
> a modification. Do the math.
Yeah, that *is* weird. I wonder if their lawyers intended to say that.
Not only Guinness - Linux is good for you, too.
-- Banzai on IRC
More information about the legal-talk