[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL: Who is the licensor / whose "database" is it?

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Thu Dec 11 18:06:21 GMT 2008


Hi,

Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El Miércoles, 10 de Diciembre de 2008, Frederik Ramm escribió:
>> 1. Each mapper has his own database, of which he makes a copy available
>> to OSM under ODbL which then creates a derived database. In that case,
>> of course, each mapper is a licensor, and OSM is a giant work derived
>> from many individual databases.
> 
> Yep.
> 
> Temporary files (or information arranged in memory) in your computer are 
> considered databases, so I'd go with option 1.

Even for someone who edits using Potlatch?

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"




More information about the legal-talk mailing list