[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL: Who is the licensor / whose "database" is it?
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Dec 11 18:06:21 GMT 2008
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El Miércoles, 10 de Diciembre de 2008, Frederik Ramm escribió:
>> 1. Each mapper has his own database, of which he makes a copy available
>> to OSM under ODbL which then creates a derived database. In that case,
>> of course, each mapper is a licensor, and OSM is a giant work derived
>> from many individual databases.
>
> Yep.
>
> Temporary files (or information arranged in memory) in your computer are
> considered databases, so I'd go with option 1.
Even for someone who edits using Potlatch?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list