[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL: Who is the licensor / whose "database" is it?

[Iván Sánchez Ortega]

El Jueves, 11 de Diciembre de 2008, Frederik Ramm escribió:
> > Temporary files (or information arranged in memory) in your computer are
> > considered databases, so I'd go with option 1.
>
> Even for someone who edits using Potlatch?

IMHO, yes.

Heck, I'd even hold that a data array of any kind held in RAM qualifies as a 
database. Not just because it's an array, but because somebody decided what 
goes into that array and in which way.

Did somebody have to mindfully click-click-click-click to enter data in 
potlach? Database.

(Of course, this is only my opinion)

Cheers,
-- 
----------------------------------
Iván Sánchez Ortega <ivan at sanchezortega.es>

MSN:i_eat_s_p_a_m_for_breakfast at hotmail.com
Jabber:ivansanchez at jabber.org ; ivansanchez at kdetalk.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20081211/b997a326/attachment.pgp>