[OSM-legal-talk] Question on derived datasets - old license and proposed license...

[Simon Ward]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:20:32PM +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> I cannot speak for everyone, but I do think that the general idea is to make 
> the ODbL work like a copyleft license (i.e. you're required to distribute 
> the "source" data only to the people you distribute the maps to). You'll have 
> to wait for the final, revised version to be sure.

I’d rather not wait for a less than acceptable licence.  I’d like to
sort out any problems beforehand.

For me, allowing my contributions to be distributed without a
share-alike is going to take some pretty damn good convincing.

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20081009/2d4451a9/attachment.pgp>