[OSM-legal-talk] License License License

[Richard Fairhurst]

Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:

> Going back to the newly uploaded draft [1]. Maybe it's me, maybe it's
> the legal speak, but where does it explicitly say that if someone
> creates and releases to an unsuspecting public a derived work (paper
> map piddled on by performance artist, say) then they have to also make
> available any derived database that they used to make it with?

/me starts to laugh hysterically.

The version on the OSMF site is not the latest one (i.e. the one  
containing the work which OSMF paid Jordan for). What the hell, I'll  
attach it, let's see if mailman lets it through.

cheers
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Open_Data_Commons_licence_no_track_changes_10_April.rtf
Type: text/rtf
Size: 100605 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20081013/844f70d0/attachment.bin>