[OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final call for comments

[Frederik Ramm]

Andy,

Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
> You are already aware that the OSMF has an ongoing project in this respect
> and SteveC posted an update on progress only two days ago. Most of what you
> are suggesting above is already in our implementation plan.

Can I suggest that the Foundation publish their plan to avoid double and 
triple work. I had until now concluded from the relative lack of 
communications on the part of the Foundation that there isn't a real 
plan and was therefore quite happy for someone (Peter) to show some 
initiative. (Indeed I assumed that the Foundation would be happy as well 
- the Foundation didn't give the impression of embracing the topic at 
all so I figured they might be relieved to have Peter do it.) Apologies 
if I misjudged the Foundation's work - it wouldn't hurt if the 
Foundation not only worked hard but also talked about it ;-)

Does the Foundation's plan have any sort of dates put to it, or any 
timeframe at all, or is it more or less "it takes as long as it takes"?

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"