[OSM-legal-talk] "A Creative Commons iCommons license"

[Richard Fairhurst]

CC-BY-SA says:

You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a
later version of this License with the same License Elements as this
License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same
License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Japan). 

<slightly provocative>
Could we ask CC to declare that the new fabulous ODbL, after due revision
and comments by the community, can be considered a Creative Commons iCommons
licence for the purposes of the above - in much the same way as FSF
permitted migration from GFDL to CC-BY-SA?
</slightly provocative>

cheers
Richard
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22A-Creative-Commons-iCommons-license%22-tp22260709p22260709.html
Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.