[OSM-legal-talk] Proper attribution
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Tue Oct 20 13:13:31 BST 2009
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
> The main issue of debate surrounds exactly what forms of attribution
> are/are not valid.
And this is not made easier by the fact that what is valid and what not
is not the community's decision but (within the confines of the license
text) that of the individual contributor.
Assuming for a moment that my contributions to OSM are copyrightable and
the CC-BY-SA license is valid, then if I license my data CC-BY-SA I have
the right to request anyone using my data, or building or using derived
versions thereof, to provide attribution in the form I believe is
required, and I can drag them to court if they don't.
So even if the attribution you provide looks ok to the majority of the
community, it only needs "one especially vociferous individual" who has
contributed to the data you are using to cause you trouble.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list