[OSM-legal-talk] Proper attribution
Sam Larsen
samlarsen1 at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Oct 20 14:11:46 BST 2009
----- Original Message ----
> From: Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
> To: Licensing and other legal discussions. <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 October, 2009 13:13:31
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proper attribution
>
> Hi,
>
> Tom Hughes wrote:
> > The main issue of debate surrounds exactly what forms of attribution
> > are/are not valid.
>
> And this is not made easier by the fact that what is valid and what not
> is not the community's decision but (within the confines of the license
> text) that of the individual contributor.
>
> Assuming for a moment that my contributions to OSM are copyrightable and
> the CC-BY-SA license is valid, then if I license my data CC-BY-SA I have
> the right to request anyone using my data, or building or using derived
> versions thereof, to provide attribution in the form I believe is
> required, and I can drag them to court if they don't.
So it seems I have stumbled back on to the license debate.
>
> So even if the attribution you provide looks ok to the majority of the
> community, it only needs "one especially vociferous individual" who has
> contributed to the data you are using to cause you trouble.
I guess this will only be resolved / improved by ODbL.
Until that time, i guess the more attribution the better and following the guidelines on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ
will suffice.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list