[OSM-legal-talk] Size of NearMap Contribution

[David Groom]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frederik Ramm" <frederik at remote.org>
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Size of NearMap Contribution


>
> Hi,
>
> John Smith wrote:
>>> (Not, of course, this particular version of the CT, if that's what 
>>> you're
>>
>> Exactly... you are trying to sell us a particular happy meal that
>> isn't making us happy...
>
> "us" being...?
>
> And I'm not trying to sell anything. If you agree that some for of CT is 
> required, and you have a better idea, then why don't you try to "sell it 
> to us".
>
> My main problem is that we're having this discussion now, when the CT were 
> finalised in December last year, and we started to have new users

Frederik

According to the LWG minutes the CT wre finalised and agreed by legal 
counsel sometime between 16 June 2010 and 22 June 2010, not in December last 
year.

David

> agree to the CT in spring this year. What new facts have arisen since 
> then?
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
>