[OSM-legal-talk] Size of NearMap Contribution

[Frederik Ramm]

David,

David Groom wrote:
> According to the LWG minutes the CT wre finalised and agreed by legal 
> counsel sometime between 16 June 2010 and 22 June 2010, not in December 
> last year.

My apologies. In that case: "My main problem is that we're having this 
discussion now, when the CT were finalised in June, instead of before that."

Contrary to what John seems to assume, there is not a single item in the 
CT that I need to sell to anybody. My main concern is to have something 
viable & reliable and I thought the current CT were just that. If LWG 
had come up with something slightly different and said "that's it" then 
I would have been very likely to have accepted that as well. If they 
change their mind and do something else now then I'll probably sigh and 
say "whatever". But if you give in to little John not liking his happy 
meal now, who's going to be the next in line to protest and want *his* 
pet change?

Bye
Frederik