[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2

[Richard Fairhurst]

David Groom wrote:
> If the OSMF board wish to move OSM to PD

They don't, rendering the rest of your e-mail moot. I mean, personally I
think it'd be lovely if they did, but they don't. I'm slightly amazed that
anyone can consider this who has ever read any licence-related postings by
the chairman of the OSMF board, who has, let's say, a slight preference for
share-alike and is, shall we also say, not too shy to come forward with his
views.

Rather, as Francis pointed out: "A mistake? Someone infelicitously drafting
the licence? It does happen you know :-)."

Or, as ever with OSM, never attribute to conspiracy that which can be
adequately explained by cock-up.

Richard


-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-phrase-in-section-2-tp5793972p5800255.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.