[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2

[Anthony]

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> David Groom wrote:
>> If the OSMF board wish to move OSM to PD
>
> They don't, rendering the rest of your e-mail moot. I mean, personally I
> think it'd be lovely if they did, but they don't. I'm slightly amazed that
> anyone can consider this who has ever read any licence-related postings by
> the chairman of the OSMF board, who has, let's say, a slight preference for
> share-alike and is, shall we also say, not too shy to come forward with his
> views.

"If you spent more than 34 seconds thinking about it you'd realise
that the best possible route for [Steve Coast] would be Public Domain
so he could do whatever he wanted. Really. Think about it." - Steve
Coast