[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2

David Groom reviews at pacific-rim.net
Wed Dec 8 01:14:24 GMT 2010


Mike

insection 4 

"4. At Your or the copyright holder's option," probably should be "You" not "Your"

David
 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mike Collinson 
  To: Licensing and other legal discussions. 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:44 PM
  Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2


  And to confirm ... the new phrase was introduced by mistake when initially setting up the 1.1 draft document and carried over into 1.2. I have removed it and checked all the other wording, though I'd certainly appreciate another check.  The only difference between the proposed 1.2  text:

  http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_933xs7nvfb 

  and currently released 1.0 text

  http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms

  should be diff-marked with colour highlighting and strike-outs.  

  Mike

  At 07:39 PM 5/12/2010, Mike Collinson wrote:

    Before this thread goes any further,Yes, a cock-up I believe, possibly mine.  The un-highlighted text should be the same as CT 1.0. Thank you fx99 for pointing it out.  Will investigate.

    Mike

    At 03:39 PM 3/12/2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:

    >David Groom wrote:
    >> If the OSMF board wish to move OSM to PD
    >
    >They don't, rendering the rest of your e-mail moot. I mean, personally I
    >think it'd be lovely if they did, but they don't. I'm slightly amazed that
    >anyone can consider this who has ever read any licence-related postings by
    >the chairman of the OSMF board, who has, let's say, a slight preference for
    >share-alike and is, shall we also say, not too shy to come forward with his
    >views.
    >
    >Rather, as Francis pointed out: "A mistake? Someone infelicitously drafting
    >the licence? It does happen you know :-)."
    >
    >Or, as ever with OSM, never attribute to conspiracy that which can be
    >adequately explained by cock-up.
    >
    >Richard
    >
    >
    >-- 
    >View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-phrase-in-section-2-tp5793972p5800255.html 
    >Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
    >
    >_______________________________________________
    >legal-talk mailing list
    >legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
    > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


    _______________________________________________
    legal-talk mailing list
    legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  legal-talk mailing list
  legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20101208/d9a7f8b4/attachment.html>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list