[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 12/10/10 00:15, Ed Avis wrote:
> Well, 67% of 'active contributors' however defined.  The definition of active
> contributor can probably be altered by the simple expedient of blocking
> contributions from those who don't click 'agree' to any proposed new policy.

Or OSMF could simply sell off the servers, have a grand board meeting on 
the Maledives with all expenses paid, and declare bankruptcy afterwards.

Oh wait, they can do that even now.

> Of course the current OSMF management act in good faith and would never
> do such a thing, but in theory it is possible.

O the things that are possible in theory!

Bye
Frederik