[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Sat Dec 11 03:36:29 GMT 2010


On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Robert Kaiser <kairo at kairo.at> wrote:
> Ed Avis schrieb:
>>
>> Well, 67% of 'active contributors' however defined.
>
> Wait. Stop for a moment here. Doesn't the CT have a very clear definition of
> how "active contributors" are defined?

There's not a clear definition of how 67% is defined, though.



More information about the legal-talk mailing list