[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources
Robert Kaiser
kairo at kairo.at
Sun Dec 12 14:08:04 GMT 2010
Anthony schrieb:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Robert Kaiser<kairo at kairo.at> wrote:
>> Ed Avis schrieb:
>>>
>>> Well, 67% of 'active contributors' however defined.
>>
>> Wait. Stop for a moment here. Doesn't the CT have a very clear definition of
>> how "active contributors" are defined?
>
> There's not a clear definition of how 67% is defined, though.
If "67%" is not clear in legalese, then legalese is stupid, IMHO. Let's
abolish all legal rules and make contributing fun instead, then.
Robert Kaiser
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list