[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

[Francis Davey]

On 12 December 2010 14:08, Robert Kaiser <kairo at kairo.at> wrote:
>
> If "67%" is not clear in legalese, then legalese is stupid, IMHO. Let's
> abolish all legal rules and make contributing fun instead, then.
>

There's no such thing as "legalese" as I've said before. The CT's
don't say "67%" they say "2/3", which is completely clear. The phrase
"at least a 2/3 majority vote" has a pretty clear and unambiguous
meaning.

-- 
Francis Davey