[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Tue Dec 14 09:42:49 GMT 2010


Francis,

On 12/14/10 10:38, Francis Davey wrote:
> Anyway, this is a governance issue rather than a legal one. As drafted
> the CT's will require 2/3 of all active contributors, not merely those
> who vote.

As written in another message, I believe that in this case an active 
contributor is one who votes (or, at least, replies to the email - the 
CTs don't say whether the email used to verify active-contributor status 
is the vote email at the same time, but it might be).

Bye
Frederik



More information about the legal-talk mailing list