[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Tue Dec 14 09:42:49 GMT 2010
Francis,
On 12/14/10 10:38, Francis Davey wrote:
> Anyway, this is a governance issue rather than a legal one. As drafted
> the CT's will require 2/3 of all active contributors, not merely those
> who vote.
As written in another message, I believe that in this case an active
contributor is one who votes (or, at least, replies to the email - the
CTs don't say whether the email used to verify active-contributor status
is the vote email at the same time, but it might be).
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list