[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

[Francis Davey]

On 14 December 2010 09:42, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>
> As written in another message, I believe that in this case an active
> contributor is one who votes (or, at least, replies to the email - the CTs
> don't say whether the email used to verify active-contributor status is the
> vote email at the same time, but it might be).
>

That was a drafting point I raised earlier, namely that "responds
within 3 weeks" needs qualification, though its probably implied that
"responds" means "responds to a request to vote", as it stands it
feels uncomfortably vague.

-- 
Francis Davey