[OSM-legal-talk] Licence clarification

Simone Cortesi simone at cortesi.com
Tue Feb 9 17:58:21 GMT 2010

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:43, Per-Olof Norén <pelle at alma.nu> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, this is to be considered derived work, no?
> What we planned to do was to :
> 1. Supply the printed work a proper cc-by-sa attribution.
> 2. Donate / revise information in the currently available POI:s.
> The client has agreed to become OSM contributors and expand the OSM map
> around the POI:s in order by be able to use OSM instead of some other
> (non-free) map data provider.
> Any suggestions or legal issues that we need to consider before getting
> to work on this is highly apreciated.

I cant give you a "certified" answer, not being a lawyer, but to the
best of mi knowledge, this is a suitable use and an encouraged one.


More information about the legal-talk mailing list