[OSM-legal-talk] public transport routing and OSM-ODbL

[Oliver (skobbler)]

>I read this and thought
>"if we have people who have had lots of time to think about this proposed
>licence change come to differing opinions on rather basic questions of how
we
>can use the data once its been put under this new license
>well who understands what it is good for?" 
>
>Anything this contrived and complex that the potential users can't sort it
out
>fails the usability test.

I agree that the new license is far from easy. However, this thread is about
finding a "hole in the license" to keep data private. And it seems there is
no hole...(unless you keep it in a separate, unlinked database)

The share-alike clause makes the license business unfriendly while at the
same time protects the data from exploitation. It is always a trade-off. 

Regards,
Oliver
-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-public-transport-routing-and-OSM-ODbL-tp5265671p5270043.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.